Talk:California State Route 188

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article California State Route 188 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
June 26, 2012 Good article nominee Listed
WikiProject U.S. Roads (Rated GA-class, High-importance)
U.S. Roads WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Topics
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
USRD MTF.svg
This article has a map. If the map has an error, please work with the maps task force to correct it.
USRD KML.svg
This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the maps task force to correct it.

Map[edit]

The map looks better if it's zoomed in more; the highlighted route on the current map looks too short. ^_^ AL2TB ^_^ 04:03, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

Toolbox

See WP:DEADREF
for dead URLs

This review is transcluded from Talk:California State Route 188/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 17:07, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    See comment section below.Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 18:20, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Comments[edit]

  • Reference number 1 is not working. Fix it or delete it. I will pass the article once this issue is resolved. Everything else in the article is good.--Dom497 (talk) 17:12, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
    • Fixed; we can thank Microsoft for making a new XLSX format. :/ --Rschen7754 17:57, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

The article will be on hold for 7 days.--Dom497 (talk) 17:12, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

I have passed the article.--Dom497 (talk) 18:20, 26 June 2012 (UTC)