Talk:Canadian Football Act
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NAFTA
[edit]However, some legal scholars have warned that such a law enacted today might violate the North American Free Trade Agreement.
this statement is flase, cuz NAFTA currently is not in conflict with such a ban, and thus it is legal. NAFTA is in no way a EU. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.237.54.62 (talk) 04:43, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Canadian Football Act/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Very informative, but too short to be a B, so it's a Start. TFCforever (talk) |
Last edited at 02:42, 24 November 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 10:47, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class law articles
- Unknown-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Start-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- Start-Class Toronto articles
- Low-importance Toronto articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- Start-Class Canadian football articles
- Unknown-importance Canadian football articles
- WikiProject Canadian football articles