Talk:Cantarell (typeface)

Criticism still valid?

I wonder how valid the criticism still is. After initial release, some glyphs have been completely redone, many have been changed, and there has been a lot of work going on to improve hinting, kerning and metrics in general. Also, the latest release includes Cyrillic coverage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:470:1F15:741:219:66FF:FE3E:D29D (talk) 14:13, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cantarell definitely looks much nicer than it used to, and yes, this includes Cyrillic. Now all we eed is a reliable source saying that. - Sikon (talk) 03:14, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The feature image correct?

I use Cantarell font and found that the letter l (small letter L) has a little curve on its tail, but the feature image in the box on the right shows a straight l.

I wonder whether Cantarell font has updated and some glyphs have been changed? If so, please update the image.

M13253 (talk) 13:46, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It has been updated to the Cantarell found in GNOME 3.8 bruce89 (talk) 10:37, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unicode coverage

cf. Free_UCS_Outline_Fonts#Unicode_coverage or DejaVu_fonts#Unicode_coverage how about it? Echinacin35 (talk) 19:50, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Cantarell (typeface). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://abattis.org/cantarell/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:44, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cantarell (typeface). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723232436/http://abattis.org/cantarell/ to http://abattis.org/cantarell/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:54, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]