This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it (including Nova Scotia) may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Somebody wrote here that someone "believes that ruins in the area are the remnants of a 15th-century Chinese". The article under this title has been miscited, as it declares just the contrary. I reworded all this stuff accordingly.
The article as written provides the refutation of a claim but no details of what claim is being refuted. The reader's first thought is "so what ?", since it is impossible to evaluate the significance of a refutation without knowing the significance of the claim. If the claim isn't significant enough to be described why on earth is it thought to be significant enough to be refuted ? It's as if archaeologists were to refute the existence of Chinese ruins on the Moon. Not exactly surprising and hardly something that needs to be mentioned. -- Derek Ross | Talk20:34, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
