Talk:Carndonagh Community School

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Copyvio

The text on the article was indeed copyrighted. It was most likely a student or teacher that placed it there imho. The text also contains peacock terms making it unsuitable for inclusion into Wikipedia. Can an admin please revert to the original text (that I wrote)? --J a son ^(talk) 12:11, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you mean reverting back to this edit, you can do that yourself, but then the article becomes just another school stub with no notability and is, I think, a candidate for deletion. ww2censor 13:23, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do think that the article, even in stub form, should be kept as it is worthy of notability. Surely the length of an article should not change its notability? --J a son ^(talk) 12:35, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your own words say it all. You say it is worthy of notability, but it is not notable now. An article length has nothing to do with its notability so long as it makes some claim to notability and this article does not, even in its original form before the copyvio edit. Sorry, if you have some verifiable notable information about this school then maybe it might be keep but either edit provides no notability so it is a candidate for deletion. ww2censor 16:00, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are many schools that have no notability according to your criteria, such as Lisnagarvey High School. If you do intend on deleting the article, then please put it to AfD. --J a son ^(talk) 01:42, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't delete articles, only an admin can do that, so let them decide based on the tag and talk page. It is not my criteria but I have seem several new pages to schools that have been deleted for the same reason and some contained more detail but were, even so, not notable. I am sure there are many more similar school studs that really should be deleted but I have more constructive things to do with my time than search them out. Cheers ww2censor 15:13, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio resolved

I have reverted the article back to a non-copyvio version. There doesn't seem to be very many people with the stomach to work through an AfD nomination for a school these days, so I guess the article's pretty safe for a while. I did add a few labels indicating how to improve it. --Alvestrand (talk) 08:18, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Carndonagh Community School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:06, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]