Talk:Carolina Beach, North Carolina
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Why, why, WHY do all of these North Carolina beach articles contain POV problems??? They generally read like poorly-written travel magazine copy. Please, somebody who knows about North Carolina beaches, fix this article!
- Do doo d'dooooo... SUPER WILMINGTONIAN IS HERE..... eh.. i'll try my best to add as much info as i can to these articles... but seeing as i am only 18, i cannot add much about history.. --Anidnmeno 02:46, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Proposed merge with Carolina Beach Skate Park
[edit]Not clear from this unreferenced article how it is notable to merit its own page; information from here could be placed at Carolina Beach. PaintedCarpet (talk) 22:51, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Carolina Beach, North Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fprod%2Fwww%2Fdecennial.html to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:26, 16 November 2016 (UTC)