Jump to content

Talk:Catweazle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Stubbiness ??

[edit]

Okay, I give up... Why is this article a stub ? It looks fine to me ( or it will do, once I've fixed one tiny typo ). WMMartin 20:11, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The link to the Geofrey Bayldon interview doesn't work

IceDragon64 (talk) 20:13, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I would like to add two important links for "Catweazle":

www.catweazle-fan.de/index_e.htm CATWEAZLE Fanpage (in English and German)

and

www.catweazlefanclub.co.uk The official Catweazle Fan Club

CatweazleFan (talk) 17:23, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rerun

[edit]

All my life I have wondered why it wasn't rerun on British TV. I never did find out- it should be, it was a well-loved series. If anyone finds that one out, can they put the info here.

IceDragon64 (talk) 19:44, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Official Website

[edit]

how can a Fanclub be a official Website? I love Catweazle (and bought it on DVD) but a Fanclubsite is the official Site of the Fanclub - not from Catweazle -- Hartmann Schedel cheers 23:37, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aside from the 'Catweazle Movie' site, the Catweazle Fan Club site is the only website officially endorsed with relevant permissions by its creator Richard Carpenter who 'owns' the name 'Catweazle' (presumably now part of his estate). It is also the only site officially patronised by all surviving principal cast members. 82.20.14.25 (talk) 15:22, 5 May 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Rerun

[edit]

I remember seeing this in the early 80's so it was definitely rerun. I wasn't born when it was first shown. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.182.58.120 (talk) 16:59, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Needs further classification, infobox details

[edit]

Was this a comedy, a children's series, a parody of a children's series, a serious attempt a time-travel science-fantasy, or what?  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼  06:05, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Catweazle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:10, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Catweazle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:57, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]