Talk:Central District Football Club

would the obvious Eagles desi stop vandalising this page??? Not one decent punchline or joke in it anyway. Belldogs?? Come on, you would have to be a member of the Eagles **** Cheer Squad to find that even remotely funny. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 192.43.227.18 (talk • contribs) 04:59, 3 May 2006 (UTC).

125 points!! How long did you stay in the 2004 GF??—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pontsticill (talk • contribs) 04:46, 3 October 2006 (UTC).

Reverted Port Adelaide Magpies FC to just Port Adelaide FC. Strictly speaking, the PAMFC did not have anything to do with the 7 in a row GF's. Magpies were only formed in 1997.

Inserted the removed links back again. For one thing, cdfc.info is the official club forum, don't see why it shouldn't be here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by God Save the Tsar (talk • contribs) 05:37, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

reverted article back re the UK Soccer club and Footscray influence on the colours, this isn't what is written in the history of the club section from the CDFC Almanac in 1994. Will add the Footscray element though. —Preceding unsigned comment added by God Save the Tsar (talk • contribs) 05:25, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

what is the basis for "Central District appear to be growing from strength to strength and will clearly continue to dominate the SANFL for many years." Looking back they have been dominant for the last 10 years but how is this an indicator of future performance? I suggest this statement be deleted or revised --Eas21c (talk) 15:03, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:WoodvilleDesign.png

Image:WoodvilleDesign.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:53, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:BulldogsLogo.png

Image:BulldogsLogo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)