Talk:Chamber of Deputies (Mexico)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Table figures[edit]

Are these the best figures available? The 300 don't add up (by 20!), and neither do the 200. The official Ch. of Deps. website isn't much help. Hajor 14:00, 11 Jan 2004 (UTC)

I corrected the table, i think now it makes sense... a few issues with the official site, and some deputies were independent, so i added the change to the table.. - Litebox

Blast and damn! The good ones lost!

The total seats column doesn't add up to 500, it adds up to 499.--Sparrowhawk64 (talk) 00:09, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MMP or parallel voting?[edit]

I've noticed that in both houses, some (60% in the Chamber and 75% in the Senate) are elected by a similar concept to New Zealand's "electorate vote" and the rest (40% in the Chamber ad 25% in the Senate) are elected by a similar concept to New Zealand's "party vote." Is the system Mixed Member Proportional (which means all seats are distributed according to the party votes) or parallel voting (which means that only the "list seats" are proportionally distributed)? Scott Gall 06:40, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • I just found on the respective articles that the Chamber of Deputies utilises MMP and the Senate utilises parallel voting. Scott Gall 06:43, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Both Houses use Parallel voting (Supplementary Member) system. The list section for the Chamber is NOT MMS like New Zealand rather it is proportional only to those elected on the list and doesn't take into account results of the first-past-the-post section.

Mexico's parallel voting system

(Coachtripfan (talk) 16:04, 6 September 2013 (UTC))[reply]

File:Logo Convergencia.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Logo Convergencia.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:09, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo Partido Verde.png Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Logo Partido Verde.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:10, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Correct diagram?[edit]

There are two different diagrams up, neither of which matches the numbers listed in the article. Are either of them right, or does another one need to be made? HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 21:52, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]