Talk:Charlton v. Kelly

This article follows the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Legal. It uses the Bluebook legal referencing style. This citation style uses standardized abbreviations, such as "N.Y. Times" for The New York Times. Please review those standards before making style or formatting changes. Information on this referencing style may be obtained at: Cornell's Basic Legal Citation site.

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I apologize that this is very sparse. But I figured it'd be best to get the ball rolling if anyone knows more about this case and/or proper Wiki formatting for SCOTUS cases. Ando228 (talk) 17:52, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unless the article contains some prose soon, it is going to get deleted as being empty. Even if it is just a line explaining what the article is actually about (something like "Charlton v. Kelly was a...") please write it- seems a shame to lose an article like this. J Milburn (talk) 17:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is the info box not enough? The problem is I really don't have time to read the entire case, look up subsequent cases and the like. Since it pertains to extradition treaties, it's still relevant but I'm no expert on law. Ando228 (talk) 18:39, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What you've added is fine to deal with the urgent threat of it being deleted. Further expansion could be easily done by the addition of reliable sources. J Milburn (talk) 18:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]