Talk:Chess aesthetics

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move to Chess aesthetics TJRC (talk) 23:19, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"chess aesthetics" → Chess Aesthetics — Looks better and probably makes it easier to find. Azlan iqbal (talk) 09:15, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-support. I'm not sure whether "aesthetics" should be capitalised, but those quotation marks need to go. PC78 (talk) 15:33, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-support; move to Chess aesthetics. The 'A' should not be capitalized, this is not a proper noun. 'C' should be capitalized as the title of the article. (This does not appear to be a controversial move; I say , be WP:BOLD and just move it.) TJRC (talk) 18:49, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Someone please move it to: Chess aesthetics Azlan iqbal (talk) 22:44, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This seems uncontroversial, so I'm just going to move it. TJRC (talk) 23:01, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. TJRC (talk) 23:19, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.