Talk:Chris Spence (journalist)

This article was nominated for deletion on November 24, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contesting speedy delete

Please explain what sections of this article you would like to see removed.

The personal history is not relevant or appropriate for an encyclopaedia article. The only notable thing about this subject appears to be his book; if this is a notable publication (no idea if it is) then perhaps it should have its own page and this one be deleted. If you can demonstrate the notability of this subject, then please follow the manual of style and the guidelines on biographies of living persons to produce an good-quality article. Lou.weird 13:31, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I will change it. Please note. Forming a rock band is also notable. I note a lot of other rock stars have their personal histories on this site.

Ok. done. Hope all ok now.

This page contains serious inaccuracies and misrepresentations. As I am the subject of this entry, I can confirm that much of the material it contains is erroneous, malicious and borders on libel. I would note that my book was not a best-selling publication and would request that this entry be deleted.

Thank youSpencechris 17:09, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BLP

This article is a biography of a living person. Remember:

"Editors must take particular care adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page. Such material requires a high degree of sensitivity, and must adhere strictly to the law in Florida, United States and to our content policies, especially:

We must get the article right. [1] " Thanks. --Evb-wiki 17:01, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Surely , correcting the factual inaccuracies is the best answer here, not deleting the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.142.226.26 (talk)

Done. All parts of the article that may appear to not be neutral have now been removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.142.226.26 (talk) 22:39, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

This article was nominated for deletion on October 11, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep per WP:HEY.

Subject requesting deletion

As the subject of this article, I am again requesting its deletion, for two reasons: a) firstly, it still contains errors. For example, the references to work that it is claimed i did on climate change in the Mackenzie Basin and Northwest Canada is wrong. There are, in fact, two climate change writers/researchers named Chris Spence, and whoever wrote this entry has included work from both of them. Also, I would argue that the entry does not take a neutral point of view (NPOV), since it seems in some instances to focus on the negative reviews of my work, rather than the many positive ones. b) secondly, and more importantly, it is my understanding that wikipedia is supposed to contain entries on famous or noteworthy people, events, etc. I am not trying to be modest when i state that i am not famous. When this entry was originally created, it was proposed for deletion for this reason. The person who made the entry said that it should stay, and incorrectly asserted in the article that i had written a best-selling book. My book is not best-selling, selling just a few thousand copies. I am not a well known figure.

So, because of the ongoing inaccuracies and the fact that i do not justify an entry in wikipedia at this stage, i would request once again that this article be deleted.

Thanks, Chris 20:11, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Please see Wp:blp#Dealing_with_articles_about_yourself. --Evb-wiki 20:37, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Me thinks the subject doesth protest too hard. The numerous references to him on the internet concerning global warming demonstrates he is indeed noteworthy (JB) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.142.226.26 (talk) 03:39, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Corrections: The references to the other Chris Spence, the one who studied climate change in the MacKenzie Basin and NorthWest Canada have now been removed. (JB)

Delete What best selling book? This guy's book doesn't look best selling. You can get it for as little as $0.98 on the internet. Not only that but it looks like rehashed propaganda. What serious or significant statement can a journalist have to say about a technical subject like causes, significance, or consequences of Global Warming, anyway? There is no notability here, just a page hyping some guy. In fact, look at the original post, it's just an ad for the book, with a link to Amazon right there at the beginning.--James52 (talk) 02:08, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The original post never mentioned amazon.com. This was put in there at the request of a wikipedia reviewer who wanted more emphasis on the book. The book explains global warming to the masses in a way that hasn't been done before. Calling it rehashed propaganda is an insult to the author of this book. [JB] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.142.226.26 (talk) 20:53, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Place of birth

Where was he born? The infobox says Wakefield but the article itself says Bingley. --JD554 (talk) 14:20, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article should be moved to Chris Spence (journalist)

I'm suggesting a page move to Chris Spence (journalist), to make way for a disambiguation page in the Chris Spence space.--Lester 08:54, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chris Spence (journalist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:01, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]