Talk:Christchurch Central City

New Zealand High‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:58, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Christchurch Central City → Central Christchurch – Relisted Vegaswikian (talk) 06:31, 2 January 2012 (UTC) I am not aware of "Christchurch Central City" being a proper name, so at the very least it should be decapitalised to "Christchurch central city", but I think "Central Christchurch" is better.relisted --Mike Cline (talk) 01:17, 26 December 2011 (UTC) Nurg (talk) 01:40, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment As somebody who actually lives there, I've always known it as 'Christchurch Central City', with that area defined as being within the 4 Avenues. Some people call it CBD, but that's certainly not correct for the area covered by the 4 Aves, because it has quite a large residential population and there's more to it than just business. For what it's worth, the article name was discussed before the article was written on the template talk page. As yet, I haven't got a strong opinion yet, but I'm not (yet) in favour of calling it 'Central Christchurch'; that's certainly much less common than what the article is called now. Schwede 66 04:52, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest Christchurch city centre. (from a UK editor) Peterkingiron (talk) 19:04, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.