Talk:Cincom Systems

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio.

Business

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Controversy

Cincom has spent the last few years ramping up their legal department, resulting in multiple lawsuits and expensive settlements for their current customers and partners. While I understand that the parties themselves are not a good sources of information for a Wiki article, it would certainly be great if someone impartial had the insight to write a "controversy" section of this description. Cincoms current legal tactics are extremely (!) aggressive and they have a lot of unhappy partners and customers as a result. Surely this is relevant information, if it can be written in a sufficiently impartial manner.2.106.249.50 (talk) 18:48, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising

This article is ghastly. It reads from beginning to end as it if was written by the marketing department. One specimen: "Cincom launches its award-winning e-magazine Expert Access". Yuk. Mhkay (talk) 20:45, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, it may look Yuk, and I replaced CINCOM quotes with non-Cincom sources. But please do understand, that with "over $100 million" per year, for 21 years, they can afford to buy software companies that "do" SMALL-TALK, C-Compilers, statistical packages, and anything that the Microsofties don't buy. So what's a few million extra to have lawyers watch their back.

When they were busy copying IBM by getting universities to teach a database course by offering a free copy of their TOTAL software, IBM's only major competition in this type of sugar-coated marketing were offering free or low-cost HARDWARE - software was ignored, and hence - what's a $100 Million per year got to do with it. No need to ADVERT-HatNote the article, just find better wordings and/or sources. Even if they slightly exaggerate, being first has advantages, and they were FIRST more than just once or twice. Pi314m (talk) 06:03, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MANTIS

In the late 1980s MANTIS was a 4th generation programming language for IBM mainframe computers with CICS and VSAM.Georgopa (talk) 03:20, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Cincom Systems. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081114004304/http://www.cincom.com/us/eng/cincom/news-room/news-releases/search/newsDetailDisplay.jsp?recordId=511 to http://www.cincom.com/us/eng/cincom/news-room/news-releases/search/newsDetailDisplay.jsp?recordId=511

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:00, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A better handle

While more work could certainly make this a better article, the situation I encountered made it seem like the TOTAL people of the 1970s were too much larger than life ("PEACOCK" HatNote). A bit of Googling for the products that I left, after doing some trimming back, showed that Cincom, while neither a Microsoft nor an IBM, had much about which to brag. IBM, in fact did some of this for them- decades after Cincom's founder left IBM. The cited Smithsonian interview, http://americanhistory.si.edu/comphist/nies.htm, is worth reading. Pi314m (talk) 06:15, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]