Jump to content

Talk:Civil parishes in Cumbria

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Civil parishes in Cumbria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:33, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redlinked civil parishes

[edit]

17 parishes in the list are redlinked. I'll have a go. Polished off the South Lakeland parishes a while ago, time for a few more perhaps! Feel free to join in. PamD 10:38, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hayton and Mealo and Oughterside and Allerby done, 15 to go. PamD 17:45, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
And Setmurthy and Winscales - 13 to go. PamD 09:12, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If anyone know anything about the zero-populations "Lands common to ...", linked in this list as Skinburness Marsh, please have a go at an article! Or a useful redirect? PamD 09:16, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Woodside, Cumbria done today. PamD 15:31, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Kingmoor today. PamD 13:06, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Kingwater done. PamD 14:37, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
And Kirkandrews. PamD 11:40, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Kirklinton Middle today. PamD 21:46, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@PamD: Skinburness Marsh appears to just be a description for Lands common to Holme Abbey, Holme Low and Holme St Cuthbert[1], yes it should have an article. I have added 2 more red links where parishes were merged. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:45, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Civil parishes in Cumbria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:21, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Civil parishes in Cumbria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:39, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Civil parishes in Cumbria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:29, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2023 updates

[edit]

The article has been tagged as in need of update after the recent local govt changes. I've tweaked the column headings to clarify current status. I suggest that we should retain the Districts as useful information, while adding a new column for the Unitary Authorities. PamD 22:57, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Populations

[edit]

The "Population" column does not specify a date, but it looks as if many of the figures may be 2001 rather than 2011. PamD 23:05, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]