Talk:Clackline Bridge/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Admrboltz (talk · contribs) 23:11, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Looks good, just a few details:

"The bridge has undergone multiple alterations, the original piers remain." - incomplete sentence, are you missing a "however" after the comma?
Fixed - Evad37 [talk] 09:16, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"foundation rocks 1.5 metres (4 ft 11 in)" Now {{convert/spell}} isn't perfect, its actually being depreciated, but {{convert}} is now doing spelling. See here - it also does "and a half" correctly and not "zero point five".
Done for that distance, and one in the paragraph below - Evad37 [talk] 09:16, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Can we get {{inflation}} values for the costs in the history section?
{{inflation}} is for Consumer Price Index values, not capital expenses or government expenses. I have previously looked for road/bridge construction cost indexes, but only found data going back to the late 1980s or early 90s - Evad37 [talk] 09:16, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Please add a Geo-location tag tag to the image.
Done - Evad37 [talk] 09:16, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

--Admr Boltz 23:11, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Admrboltz, thanks for starting a review. I'm away on holiday until Jan 10, and currently on an iPad, so I won't be doing much editing till then, or the next day. Thanks, Evad37 [talk] 23:51, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. --Admr Boltz 23:53, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have responded to your comments above. If you have any comments or suggestions for improving the article to FA-quality, that would be appreciated. Thanks, Evad37 [talk] 09:16, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will pass this article now. As far as going to FAC, you will want to go to WP:PR as my comments may or may not be helpful in light of how much work my articles need when at FAC. --Admr Boltz 02:49, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]