Talk:Claudia Riner/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kavyansh.Singh (talk · contribs) 05:41, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator: theleekycauldron (talk · contribs) at 05:18, 6 May 2022 (UTC) [reply][reply]

GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): looks good! It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): N/A b (appropriate use with suitable captions): N/A
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Comments

Prose

between 1978 and 1981 from the 36th district. — "from 1978 to 1981 representing the 36th district."
Riner was characterized as a polarizing figure — by whom? Better may be "widely characterized", if multiple sources agree.
She married — At the start of every paragraph, you'll have to replace pronouns like "She", "her", with "Riner". In this case, "Caludia" would be better to avoid and confusion between she and her husband.
for the Democratic Party — Link Democratic Party (United States)
Link The Lexington Herald
In 1980, The Lexington Herald wrote that — Optional comment: Newspaper's don't write, correspondent do! Same with "The Courier-Journal remarked that"
she felt the Democratic Party — "she felt that the Democratic Party"
"the special session did not allow enough time for an intensive study... We are asking the legislators to take another chance to look at it" — Add (#1) {{Nbsp}} before the ellipsis (#2) citation directly after the quote.
in the 36th district — "from the 36th district"
with 52 percent of the vote, or 73 votes — specify that 73 votes is the margin of victory.
n the anti-abortion movement — Maybe link United States anti-abortion movement
against William F. Payne — don't repeat the name, just mention the last-name.
In her very first days in office — "initial days"?
by the Supreme Court of the United States — do we need to mention "United States"?
- Yeah, 'cause it was upheld by the Kentucky Supreme Court... theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 01:46, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
in a 5-4 committee vote — should be an en-dash
- Shame on me, I usually love en dashes over hyphens theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 01:46, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"I feel like I have been elected... we ran as a team — Add {{Nbsp}} before the ellipsis
he would sit in her chair when the House was not in session — Well, that is funny!
The Lexington Herald v. the Lexington Herald — Consistency needed
Gore was running for president, Lieberman for vice president. — Can link Al and Joe
what he saw as President Bill Clinton's "immoral behavior". — Clinton–Lewinsky scandal? Might need to ellaborate if the source allows
- Annoyingly enough, the source doesn't mention the scandal, so said "immoral behavior" could be that time he willingly ate broccoli. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 01:46, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

Hyphenate ISBNs, rest looks good!

– Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 06:29, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kavyansh.Singh: Thanks for the review! I think I got almost all of it :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 01:47, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoting! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 06:02, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kavyansh.Singh: thanks very much! :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 07:19, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]