Talk:Claudia Riner

Claudia Riner has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 9, 2022. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Claudia Riner appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 May 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Claudia Riner was falsely accused of distributing lesbian erotica in the Kentucky House of Representatives?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Claudia Riner.

Wikipedia

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Women in Red

This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

United States: Kentucky / Louisville Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Kentucky portal This article is supported by WikiProject Kentucky (assessed as Low-importance).
	Kentucky portal This article is supported by WikiProject Louisville (assessed as Low-importance).

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 10:39, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

~~... that Claudia Riner denies all allegations of distributing lesbian erotica in the Kentucky House of Representatives?~~
- ALT0a: ... that Claudia Riner was falsely accused of distributing lesbian erotica in the Kentucky House of Representatives?
- Reviewed: The Anthropocene Reviewed
- Comment: ~~Claudia V in my series of claudias.~~ (actually... I don't like her very much.) this might be the longest initial draft I've ever submitted to DYK, but there was quite a bit of information there at once. I happen to strongly dislike this woman, so if the reviewer could give it an extra-close neutrality scrub, that'd be appreciated :)

Created by Theleekycauldron (talk). Self-nominated at 08:53, 25 April 2022 (UTC).[reply]

No other comment on the article or the nomination, but I feel that the hook may be a BLP violation. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 03:23, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Narutolovehinata5: ah, i see. given that she didn't do it, how do you feel about ALT0a? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 03:33, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  ALT0a is better, but I'd leave the review to another editor. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 03:37, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: the article is now a GA, too! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 07:20, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
New enough, long enough, looks to be reasonably within policy, although the "persecution of Christians" in China is sourced only to Riner stating that; try to make that more precise so it isn't claimed in wikivoice. General sourcing is very newspaper-heavy but the article still reads neutral. ALT0a is fine (reasonable paraphrase of the sourced statement in the article), QPQ has been done. —Kusma (talk) 09:25, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
theleekycauldron: Ping! Please see the note on China and wikivoice above. —Kusma (talk) 19:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- thanks for the review, Kusma! I threw in a "perceived". theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 19:29, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Claudia Riner/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kavyansh.Singh (talk · contribs) 05:41, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator: theleekycauldron (talk · contribs) at 05:18, 6 May 2022 (UTC) [reply][reply]

GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): looks good! It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): N/A b (appropriate use with suitable captions): N/A
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Comments

Prose

between 1978 and 1981 from the 36th district. — "from 1978 to 1981 representing the 36th district."
Riner was characterized as a polarizing figure — by whom? Better may be "widely characterized", if multiple sources agree.
She married — At the start of every paragraph, you'll have to replace pronouns like "She", "her", with "Riner". In this case, "Caludia" would be better to avoid and confusion between she and her husband.
for the Democratic Party — Link Democratic Party (United States)
Link The Lexington Herald
In 1980, The Lexington Herald wrote that — Optional comment: Newspaper's don't write, correspondent do! Same with "The Courier-Journal remarked that"
she felt the Democratic Party — "she felt that the Democratic Party"
"the special session did not allow enough time for an intensive study... We are asking the legislators to take another chance to look at it" — Add (#1) {{Nbsp}} before the ellipsis (#2) citation directly after the quote.
in the 36th district — "from the 36th district"
with 52 percent of the vote, or 73 votes — specify that 73 votes is the margin of victory.
n the anti-abortion movement — Maybe link United States anti-abortion movement
against William F. Payne — don't repeat the name, just mention the last-name.
In her very first days in office — "initial days"?
by the Supreme Court of the United States — do we need to mention "United States"?
- Yeah, 'cause it was upheld by the Kentucky Supreme Court... theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 01:46, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
in a 5-4 committee vote — should be an en-dash
- Shame on me, I usually love en dashes over hyphens theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 01:46, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"I feel like I have been elected... we ran as a team — Add {{Nbsp}} before the ellipsis
he would sit in her chair when the House was not in session — Well, that is funny!
The Lexington Herald v. the Lexington Herald — Consistency needed
Gore was running for president, Lieberman for vice president. — Can link Al and Joe
what he saw as President Bill Clinton's "immoral behavior". — Clinton–Lewinsky scandal? Might need to ellaborate if the source allows
- Annoyingly enough, the source doesn't mention the scandal, so said "immoral behavior" could be that time he willingly ate broccoli. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 01:46, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

Hyphenate ISBNs, rest looks good!

– Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 06:29, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kavyansh.Singh: Thanks for the review! I think I got almost all of it :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 01:47, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoting! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 06:02, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kavyansh.Singh: thanks very much! :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 07:19, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]