Talk:Commodore Matt Decker

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the redirect attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles

Fictional characters

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

The authors comment

Hello this is my first article and I encourage any comments and changes. Please dont think twice about making a comment on this page no matter how harsh they may be. Thank you Ulyanov322 (talk) 00:40, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Consider Deletion

Commodore Decker is not a sufficiently important character in the Star Trek universe to warrant his own article. He made only one (admittedly memorable) appearance and is not noteworthy outside the franchise. His stature is similar to or below that of Dr. Severn, Richard Daystrom, Dr. M'Benga, Flint, Anton Karidian/Kodos the Executioner, and Trelane, none of whom have (or rate) their own article. Decker's information should be confined to the List of Star Trek Characters article. HappyJake (talk) 10:07, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the prod and set up a merger discussion. Umbralcorax (talk) 18:29, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I appretiate your comment but still I think that there should always be an indepth description of any character in Star Trek that had an episode that revolved around him, and those examples of minor characters should have an article devoted to them just as this does about Decker I might just do articles on them in the future. Thank you. Ulyanov322 (talk) 02:53, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, lets inprove star trek articles rather than merging them all into 7 lists. --Alpha Quadrant (talk) 19:51, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]