Jump to content

Talk:Computer-aided audit tools

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Have a look a this contribution

[edit]

This section of this article seems not to have its place here: CAATTs and Other BEASTs for Auditors by David Coderre Please have a look at it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.156.47.202 (talk) 10:35, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Where are the citations?

[edit]

This article nees to be cited much more completely than it is. There is either a lot of OR in here or who ever has added all this contect forgot to cite most of it. There are some specific claims that should be removed until they are properly cited. Macutty (talk) 17:33, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bold textWhat is the "IS auditor"? Please explain. -- BD2412 talk 01:01, 2005 Jun 4 (UTC)


I belive that this article is far to specific, covering apparently only business applications (and this in a fairly abstract manner). Data analysis is much broader. Wouldn't it be better to write something like "data analysis is the act of transforming data with the aim of extracting useful information and facilitating conclusions"? The present article would then be an example for that. Data analysis in natural or social sciences usually does not use much of the terminology used in the present version of this wikipedia article, but it is nevertheless data analysis. --Dontaskme 21:36, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the article to Data analysis (information technology) and started writing a more general article on data analysis. Dontaskme 00:55, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As a CAATS Specialist, I do not like this article at all. I think it is very inappropriately titled. A much better title would be CAATS or CAATTS. I am going to write a new article then nominate this one for deletion. As for what an IS Auditor is, that is Information Security Auditor. But not all CAATS specialist are IS Auditors and data analysis is a very poor title for this article. Balloonman 07:06, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have gone ahead and rewritten this page significantly and saved it as Computer Aided Audit Tools. I think that page still needs some work, but it is almost 2:30am my time. This page is very poorly written and does not discuss what the title says it does. Computer Aided Audit Tools is a much better title and I hope that I've captured the real intent of this page there. People who are looking for CAATS/CAATTS will only find this page by acceident. Balloonman 08:36, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: There has obviously been a lot of work put into this article and it looks a good start. The request for delete doesn't explain why this article isn't needed and so in the absence of reason to delete I vote to keep! --Mike 22:54, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is no harm in keeping an article, so I have no problem keeping it. But the reason why I'd get rid of it is because the article really isn't about data analytics; it is about CAATS. My question becomes, "Why keep it?" The title doesn't describe what the subject is. It is poorly written and needs a lot of help. I'd get rid of it and redirect it to CAATS. The article itself needs a lot of work to clean up to make it readable/usuable---and in order to clean it up you will end up with either CAATS or Data analysis. I'd rather see effort made to enhance the latter. If it makes you feel better, consider it a "Merge" request?


I'd like to see Continuous Monitoring defined in more detail as it relates to CAATS and auditing. It could even warrant it's own page as it is probably a concept used in other professions besides auditing. Also, I do not think that the phrase "Continuous Monitoring" should be directly linked to an external website (the IIA's ITAudit). Shouldn't links within the definition only link to other Wikipedia pages? External links should be clearly segregated at the bottom of the page. Michaelmegley 19:40, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. I just noticed the little arrow indicating an external link. However, I still think that the link to the IIA is not updated or appropriate; it did not link me to a 'definition' of CM. Was it intended to link to the GTAG for Continous Auditing? Either way, I think the link should be removed if it does not point to a legitimate explanation of what CM is. I'd do the re-write myself, but I came here trying to understand just what CM is. Thus far, I have not been able to find an unambigious explanation that elaborates beyond what the two words already imply... monitoring that is continous in nature.
One problem I'm having is with the word monitoring. Most auditors think of auditing as part of the COSO cube. Thus continous monitoring and continous auditing could be synonymous.
However, the COSO model does not address the varying types of monitoring that occur. In some cases a control activity is also a monitoring activity. Some people call these monitoring controls when they are performed by management to monitor the effectiveness of controls performed by their staff. This would indicate a difference between continous monitoring and continuous auditing.
In fact, many of the activities proposed as part of continous monitoring are often just automated controls or improved reporting capabilities used in a control activity. This would also indicate that continous monitoring is a management function that is very different from the concept of continous auditing.
I think this terminology issue is the very reason we see differing opinions expressed in the audit profession on who should be accountable for continous monitoring. If the term can not be truly defined, then I propose it be deleted from the content. Michaelmegley 20:13, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New user here. Wanted to know why ActiveData was pulled as having not established a foothold when you talked about the rumored release of TopCAATS. ActiveData has over 10,000 active users and that number has been increasing by 500 plus users a month. It's also now a CCH product (pfx ActiveData). If that's not a foothold then nothing is. This page is obviously biased towards IDEA (which was originally designed and written by me BTW) and I noticed that you quickly and conveniently pulled the rumored release of TopCAATS from the text. BTW... TopCAATS promises to be an exciting product. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ou81aswell (talk • contribs) 01:34, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Table of Specialized Tools

[edit]

I've created the table of specialized tools for several purpose, which I hope will help readers:

  • Increase the overview of which tools are available.
  • Provide a platform for more columns of information that helps readers to understand the features/capabilities/differences of the tools.
  • Provide link to wikipedia articles about the tools (if any) or alternatively (as now) as external links.

Other comments:

  • If the table become large it should probably go into separate article.
  • The table if probably not exhausting so please help updating it.
  • Try to avoid double entries. Specifically the ActiveData for Excel may be a double entry (but I'm not sure about this).
  • The references to the companies should probably be moved to the External Links section.
  • The company column should may be splitted into Developed By (Company) and Publisher (Company).

Possible new columns:

The following is a list of possible columns (of information) which could be added to the table.

  • Column detailing which operating system(s) that the tools runs on, e.g. Microsoft Windows or Unix/Linux.
  • Column detailing whether the tool requires additional software, e.g. running on top Microsoft Excel.
  • Column detailing the latest version of the product.
  • Column detailing which data file formats that the tool natively supports import from.
  • Column detailing number of maximum rows (of data/transactions) that the tool can handle.
  • Column detailing whether the tool deals with strictly analysis of the data or is more focused in establishing the data, i.e. import, converting, data mining.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.221.232.92 (talk) 08:28, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Computer-aided audit tools. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:35, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Computer-aided_audit_tools&oldid=1205899860"