Talk:Cooper Creek Reservoir

Lakes Low‑importance

	Lakes portal Cooper Creek Reservoir is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

2001 health advisory

In 2001, the Oregon Department of Human Services issued a mercury-related health advisory for fish caught in the reservoir.<ref name="DHS">"Elevated Levels of Mercury in Sport-Caught Fish from Cooper Creek Reservoir, Douglas County" (PDF). Oregon Department of Human Services. February 12, 2001. Retrieved January 5, 2013.

I attempted to locate an archive copy for the {dead link} tag applied to the above citation for this statement and found none. I then attempted to locate alternate sources for the information and was able to find references that support SOME of the statement. There is a public health advisory for eating fish from the lake and it is still in effect today and it is mercury related. I have added those citations. What I can not find is a source or any reference to WHEN this advisory was issued or WHO exactly issued it. I have removed the citation from the article to this talk page, but left the statement intact with {cn} as the best solution to resolve the {dead link} and yet keep the issue open as unresolved. I am posting this here as a request for help of future editors.
---> Darryl.P.Pike (talk) 20:40, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done ---> Darryl.P.Pike (talk) 20:57, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]