Talk:Corral Hollow

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Sources

Lots of sources related to the area here. Mrfoogles (talk) 04:59, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More sources: there is a "scientific consensus statement" published here (see the link to the pdf) that I think qualifies as a reliable source. Not sure if it's self-published (the scientists who wrote it might be affiliated with Save Tesla Park), but I think it has editorial review, given the number of people who signed it.

There is also what appears to be a nice newspaper history here. Mrfoogles (talk) 22:15, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A significant amount of useful information that doesn't appear elsewhere seems to be in this report written by an expert (pdf hosted by the Save Tesla Park website), but to prove it's not self-published probably it is necessary to find the news post on the website including it. The problem is that the posts older than 2013 on the website are no longer there, and archive.org only goes back to 2012. The site's copyright notice and the date on the upload are both 2009. Mrfoogles (talk) 22:18, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also see this website Mrfoogles (talk) 02:54, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Problems

Almost all of the article is sourced, but the main problem is the Tesla and Carnegie section, which appears to be cited to a self-published source (it's unclear what the pdf it's citing is from). This probably needs to be established or re-cited. Mrfoogles (talk) 08:23, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed this. Mrfoogles (talk) 22:11, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]