Talk:County Cavan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Ireland (Rated Start-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Query re: religious sects in the county[edit]

What is the religious distribution these days? My great grandmother was from County Cavan though arriving in Canada in the third quarter of the 19th century. And Scottish as opposed to Scotch (not really Irish) and therefore unilingual Anglophone rather than Scotch Gaelic speaking like the rest of my family till well into the 20th century. But she was Presbyterian -- marriage rule right through my parents' generation in the early second half of the 20th century was doesn't matter whether the girl or boy you marry is Presbyterian or Catholic, but must be Scotch. Old friends from childhood had exactly the same rule in their families: we all of course married with ethnicity and religion the last thing on our minds. My own offspring are technically half German-Polish Jews but look 100% Scotch just like the offspring of ethnically Japanese Canadian friends, so we Celts clearly have very strong genes though not the loveliest looking on earth by any means. But have any Scottish Presbyterians or for that matter English Anglicans remained in County Cavan? Excuse excessive verbosity of my query but I am vastly interested in this assuredly trivial issue. Masalai (talk) 05:11, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Presbyterians accounted for 1.3% of the poopulation in 2006. See CSE tables (Cavan at end). Laurel Lodged (talk) 09:30, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Ah. Thank you. Must have almost entirely emigrated to the New World in the 19th century. Vast numbers of RCs too of course but obviously not the vast proportion. Masalai (talk) 16:15, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on County Cavan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:02, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Population 2016?[edit]

No source is given in the main article for the population, while the source given in the infobox is for 2011, but the population is given for 2016.--Wanfried-Dublin (talk) 16:36, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Wrong source for population[edit]

The population is given according to the 2016 census, but the source in the infobox is given for the 2011 census. Is it enough to give a wrong source if you want your edit not to be reverted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wanfried-Dublin (talkcontribs) 19:21, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on County Cavan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:07, 4 June 2017 (UTC)