Jump to content

Talk:Cover-up tattoo/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Tamzin (talk · contribs)

Reviewer: Pi.1415926535 (talk · contribs) 20:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great work on this article - it's very close to GA. Just a few changes needed or suggested, mostly formatting. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:09, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing this! I've responded to most of your items; ought to get to the rest tomorrow. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 02:27, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Pi.1415926535: I think this is ready for a second look when you're available. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 20:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Tamzin: All looks good - happy to pass this now. I realize that I forgot to request alt text for the images. That's always best practice, but not a GA requirement, so I won't hold up the pass over it. Best, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lede

[edit]
  • I recommend changing cover-up to cover-up tattoo in the first sentence - see MOS:BOLDLEDE.
  • I would consider merging the first and second paragraphs, and the third and fourth, to have more consistent paragraph lengths in the lede. Not a requirement though.
    • So the logic here was that the second and third summarize the two respective halves of "Contexts", while the fourth summarizes the other sections. Length-wise I agree it's suboptimal but the conceptual delineation is important. Very open to ideas of how to arrange things that preserve that, though. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 02:27, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contexts

[edit]

Methods

[edit]
  • Move the removal section into this section, rather than having a separate level 2 heading for one sentence.

Tattoo shop practices

[edit]

References

[edit]

Overall

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.