Talk:Cox & King

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Transport: Maritime

	Transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Maritime task force (assessed as Low-importance).

[Untitled]

Hello, I don't understand the problem. I wrote the Cox & King page here based on my own page that I refer to. I am the owner of the Cox & King site and a direct descendant of the owners of the firm. All this has arisen because I wanted the Luxury yachts site to refer to the Cox & King site; I tried putting an exterior link but it was refused and you suggested that a C&K Yachts Wikipedia site be written. So I wrote it based on elements of my own site.

I would appreciate any help you can suggest here. It would be a shame to delete the site (it took me a few hours to write it).

Many thanks for your help with this.

With best wishes, --Fhgxx (talk) 20:46, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Would it help if I simply rephrased everything so that my original site and this site are different; do note that I have put references in (that are not in the original site). I'm quite prepared to paraphrase things so as to "pass" and avoid the whole copyright issue. Many thanks for your kind help.

If you could re-write the article so that it wasn't such a direct copy of the website, then yes it would help. ArcAngel (talk) 20:59, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, I'll do so write away. Thank you for your help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.76.149.109 (talk) 05:13, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(A bit later) The new version is shorter, has slightly less information, but retains the most important points. I have tried not to repeat exact sentences. Please let me know if further changes need to be made (I'll be able to make them as of next Tuesday only). Thank you for your help. --Fhgxx (talk) 05:48, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That works for me, thanks for understanding. ArcAngel (talk) 06:10, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your kind help and understanding. Now that the page is done, can we maybe delete what is on this talk page. I'd appreciate it. Many thanks. --Fhgxx (talk) 07:14, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Content on article talk pages isn't usually deleted, it really needs to be kept intact to allow other editors to see the previous issues with the article. ArcAngel (talk) 16:58, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]