Talk:Criminal (Ra.One song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Σ (talk · contribs) 06:46, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

 Doing... →Στc. 06:46, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

My immediate comment is that the article's length is a little short. There is no specific length requirement for GA, but the article must be broad in its coverage.

Lead

Looks OK, although it needs a copyedit and rectification of some MOS problems. See WP:MOSMUSIC.

Release

Looks fine, but needs a bit of expansion, copyedit, and MOS compliance.

Critical reception

It reads like an advertisement and needs less direct copy/pastes, more prose.

See also

Looks good.

References

Some of them need cleaning up with more information; publisher, consistent date formats, and the like.

---

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   In general, the article needs copyediting, less direct quotes, and compliance with WP:MOSMUSIC.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Is there any available information? About the development of the song, for instance?

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Critical reception section reads like a advertisement.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Non-free use rationales need immediate attention, and the captions are.... vague, at most.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I'm afraid I have to fail this nomination. The article is a good start, but still has many issues that inhibit it from reaching GA. I suggest that you try to bring it up to B-class and have a peer review before another GA nomination, which I hope does succeed. Good luck. →Στc. 07:46, 18 December 2011 (UTC)