Talk:Criminal (Ra.One song)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Former good article nominee Criminal (Ra.One song) was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
December 18, 2011 Good article nominee Not listed
WikiProject Songs (Rated Redirect-class)
WikiProject icon This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Redirect page Redirect  This redirect does not require a rating on the quality scale.
 

Article title[edit]

To the few editors working diligently on this article at the moment, I do hope to bring to your attention that there is an error in the title of this page—perhaps the page's intended title should be "Criminal (Ra.One song)". The current title lacks the period between Ra and One. I would have moved the page myself but considering the expansion tag on the top of the page, I didn't want to distract any on going work. EelamStyleZ (talk) 16:30, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

a GA?!![edit]

I am sorry, but WHY is this article nominated for a GA? --Meryam90 (talk) 21:51, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Criminal (Ra.One song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Σ (talk · contribs) 06:46, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Doing...Στc. 06:46, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

My immediate comment is that the article's length is a little short. There is no specific length requirement for GA, but the article must be broad in its coverage.
Lead
Looks OK, although it needs a copyedit and rectification of some MOS problems. See WP:MOSMUSIC.
Release
Looks fine, but needs a bit of expansion, copyedit, and MOS compliance.
Critical reception
It reads like an advertisement and needs less direct copy/pastes, more prose.
See also
Looks good.
References
Some of them need cleaning up with more information; publisher, consistent date formats, and the like.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    In general, the article needs copyediting, less direct quotes, and compliance with WP:MOSMUSIC.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Is there any available information? About the development of the song, for instance?
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Critical reception section reads like a advertisement.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Non-free use rationales need immediate attention, and the captions are.... vague, at most.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    I'm afraid I have to fail this nomination. The article is a good start, but still has many issues that inhibit it from reaching GA. I suggest that you try to bring it up to B-class and have a peer review before another GA nomination, which I hope does succeed. Good luck. →Στc. 07:46, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

DYK[edit]

File:Criminal Ra.one.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

Image-x-generic.svg

An image used in this article, File:Criminal Ra.one.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:54, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Ra.One audio launch.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

Image-x-generic.svg An image used in this article, File:Ra.One audio launch.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Ra.One audio launch.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:59, 28 April 2012 (UTC)