Talk:Cryptanalysis of the Lorenz cipher

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cryptanalysis of the Lorenz cipher article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Cryptography: Computer science High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as High-importance).

Military history: Intelligence / British / European / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Intelligence task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

Future sections

After 'Testery', I am planning:

British Tunny

Newmanry

Robinsons

Colossus

Value of intelligence gained

--TedColes (talk) 12:11, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How does the undulator tape correspond to the 5-hole tape rows?

Is it just serializing each row of 5 bits or something? Which edge does it start on (the equivalent of Endianness)? Can a raw interpretation of the sample shown in the image, or an equivalent 5-hole tape, be provided? ★NealMcB★ (talk) 17:57, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More research leads to more confusion and questions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Baudot_code#Async_communication_endianness.2C_LSB_on_Left_vs_Right and some edits elsewhere: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Punched_tape&diff=731672647&oldid=731671909 Help! We need good sources and more clarity.... ★NealMcB★ (talk) 21:51, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

typical wiki - missing critique section, how stupid germans were not to change cypher methods - how useless broken codes were , hwo stupid to let germany attack poland, or dunkirk used NOT crypto.Juror1 (talk) 18:44, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Align introductory image and timeline to the right

Currently, the photograph of the Lorenz SZ42 severely disrupts the flow of the article, but I can't figure out how to put it and the timeline both on the far right without one of them getting pushed left. Can someone fix that? (I'm also not sure if there should be a timeline in the introduction to begin with, but that's not my main problem.) EpsilonCarinae (talk) 16:21, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]