Talk:Cyclone Raquel

Weather: Tropical / Southern Hemisphere Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Southern Hemisphere work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Sources

Pacific cyclone in July a freak event". Radio New Zealand International

@Undescribed: Do you think you could use the search boxs here and here to search for articles on Raquel?.Jason Rees (talk) 23:30, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jason Rees: Yes, I will try to dig up some more articles in the links you provided to add as sources.

@Jason Rees: Would you like me to send you the links? Undescribed (talk) 23:48, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Undescribed: Just add any relevant articles/information from them to the article.Jason Rees (talk) 23:51, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dead fish report and Gold Ridge dam water discharge?

@Jason Rees: These are two sources I found related to Cyclone Raquel; one mentioning reports about the schools of dead fish and corals found dead in Marovo Lagoon. - http://www.solomonstarnews.com/news/national/7426-environment-to-respond-to-dead-fish-report And the other talks about releasing untreated water from the Gold Ridge dam due to the risk of the dam breaking. - http://www.solomonstarnews.com/news/national/7423-mou-must-be-signed Is it worth mentioning either of them in the article right now, even though they haven't been proven to be a direct effect of Raquel, or is it best to hold off for now? Undescribed (talk) 03:39, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Add them in as even though their not 100% related to Raquel, its still some of the impacts. Im gonna try and focus on finishing the MH for now. Jason Rees (talk) 18:52, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and any impacts from heavy rain in the Solomon Islands in late June/early before/after Raquel still counts as Raquel.Jason Rees (talk) 19:38, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Undescribed: Feel free to work on the article when you get spare moments.Jason Rees (talk) 17:09, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jason Rees: Thank you. I've been a little busy lately but I absolutely will in my spare time. Great contributions by the way! Actually, I've also been wanting to ask you if you think it would be a good idea to bring other editors to the page as well? Or do you think it is better to keep it low-key for now until an official article is made? Undescribed (talk) 17:24, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Interestingly I have found sources that show that the Gold Ridge is related to Raquel and is something i need to get my head around.Jason Rees (talk) 00:21, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

When did Raquel enter the AUS region?

@Jason Rees: I saw a notation that you made in the MH saying that Raquel was in the Australian region before 0z on July 5th, however according to the main 2015-16 AUS page, the final advisory on Raquel was issued by Brisbane TCWC on July 2 at 06z, and advisories did not resume until July 5 at 0z; both of which are indicated in the MH section. - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2015%E2%80%9316_Australian_region_cyclone_season Am I missing some track information, and if so how can it be recovered? Undescribed (talk) 03:05, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... The gap that you are missing is the time that the system was in RSMC Nadi's AOR or the 2015-16 SPAC season. However, it looks like there was a significant relocation from BoM/Nadi just after 04/00z, which caused it too be back in the Aus region but that it wasn't significant enough for full advisories from BoM until 05/00z. I think we will be able to sort of smudge it based on the track provided by Steve Young here. However, if @Keith Edkins: could archive the Brisbane TWO's from the 4/5th it would be appreciated.Jason Rees (talk) 12:00, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the track data definitely verifies that Raquel re-entered the Aus region on the 4th. Archive discussions would make it easier to incorporate the MH info for Raquel on the 4th into the article. Undescribed (talk) 15:14, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done.--Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 18:57, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Keith Edkins:, Can i be a pain please and ask for Nadi's Tropical Disturbance Summaries from July 2 - 4 to also be archived.Jason Rees (talk) 22:34, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2015-07-02, 0900z // 2015-07-03, 0000z // 0900z - 4th July reports no disturbances.--Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 17:50, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Keith :).Jason Rees (talk) 18:00, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is ready

I think we can post this now - it's an okay article and we should make the article as it is very historically significant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Izmik (talk • contribs) 15:37, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree so too. Just maybe some more bits at the top and then it's done. Well done! What an interesting cyclone! Typhoon2013 (talk) 10:25, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]