Talk:Dai Davies (politician)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Stub-Class

Only a very brief summary of his political career. —Cuivi é nen 14:01, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not Independent Labour

The external link is a lie, Dai didn't stand as Independent Labour, and hasn't switched since. On the voting papers he was listed as Independent, he was elected as independent, and remains independent. Its as simple as that;Sources: http://www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/dai_davies/blaenau_gwent http://www.dodonline.co.uk/engine.asp?lev1=4&lev2=37&menu=45&biog=y&id=54327 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/5127262.stm http://www.politics.co.uk/issueoftheday/by-elections-june-2006-$443662$443662.htm

Mikebloke 11:21, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In fact he couldn't have stood as "Independent Labour" because such a description would not be allowed. However, given his history within the Labour Party, the fact that the election literature made it clear that he was on the political left, and the origin of the movement as a revolt against the selection of Labour candidate, it is reasonable to describe him as in some senses an unofficial Labour candidate. Fys. Ta fys aym. 23:29, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It would have been allowed; only names very similar to real parties are banned (e.g. "Literal Democrat" versus Liberal Democrat, which was the reason that law was instituted). Otherwise, parties like the Socialist Labour Party would be unable to use their name. However, he did not run as an Independent Labour candidate, so the point is moot. —Cuivi é nen 02:42, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Independent article

Could the anonymous editor who keeps removing this link [1] please make a case for doing so before they remove it in future? Thank you. Catchpole 18:28, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have just reverted a further removal of this link, and have implemented a WP:3RR block. --BrownHairedGirl ^{(talk) • (contribs)} 14:57, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the link and the article appeared to have gone. The Independent hides its archive stories behind a pay wall. Perhaps instead, the article title and date of publication should be given? Fys. Ta fys aym. 15:45, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strange, the link works fine for me. [2]. Catchpole 15:53, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected

An anon editor, possibly the same one as did the previous edits discussed above, has just removed the source again (see diff). So I have just semiprotected the page. --BrownHairedGirl ^{(talk) • (contribs)} 12:33, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]