Talk:Daily Brahmanbaria
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contested deletion
[edit]This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because this AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3) and fails WP:N and WP:V.--Leela Bratee (talk • contributions • email) 20:34, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Contested deletion
[edit]This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it could be sourced in a way that meets policy and while it's badly done that doesn't constitute a reason to speedy delete. --Crtew (talk) 15:50, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Daily Brahmanbaria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304124714/http://www.zahidalamin.com/region.php?did=54&nid=%20Brahmanbaria to http://www.zahidalamin.com/region.php?did=54&nid=%20Brahmanbaria
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked=
to true
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:09, 5 December 2016 (UTC)