Talk:Dark Tower (game)

	Games portal This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=950&dat=19820122&id=h8NaAAAAIBAJ&sjid=vFkDAAAAIBAJ&pg=5303,1434763

Photos of game

Heads up, if anyone ever wants photos of the actual game, I have a copy. --Anoma lee 14:47, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Any photos would enhance the article. :-) — Frecklefoot | Talk 15:44, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Dark tower box cover.jpg

Image:Dark tower box cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:04, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Dark tower assembled2.jpg

Image:Dark tower assembled2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:04, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More detail on lawsuit

I notice that the information provided about the lawsuit that caused Dark Tower to be discontinued is rather sketchy - I had looked at a fansite about the game, and there was a link to a law partnership's site with an article discussing the suit Burten v. Milton Bradley here.[1]

Would this be considered a 'reliable source' per WP:RS and thus useful in providing more concrete details of that event? Empath 16:50, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If the fan site has the actual public documents from the trial, then these documents could be used as reliable sources. — Val42 16:59, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I found a copy of the actual court case Burten v. Milton Bradley Co. 763 F.2d 461, 226 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 605 (1st Cir. 1985) but it is part of a course that ended in Spring 2006 and it kept at the professor's personal web site so I don't know if it qualifies under WP:RS.--BruceGrubb (talk) 12:16, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ref idea

Found a great ref in an old newspaper: http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=950&dat=19820122&id=h8NaAAAAIBAJ&sjid=vFkDAAAAIBAJ&pg=5303,1434763 --Odie5533 (talk) 13:50, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Added to ref ideas at top of page. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 15:03, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dark Tower (game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040610172848/http://gamepile.com/game04.html to http://www.gamepile.com/game04.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:34, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]