Talk:Darwin's Darkest Hour

A fact from Darwin's Darkest Hour appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 January 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the 2009 Nova episode "Darwin's Darkest Hour" was filmed for the bicentennial anniversary of Charles Darwin's birth and the 150th anniversary of the publication of his work On the Origin of Species?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Darwin's Darkest Hour.

Wikipedia

Television

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Amkgp (talk) 06:37, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the 2009 Nova episode "Darwin's Darkest Hour" was filmed for the bicentennial anniversary of Charles Darwin's death and the 150th anniversary of his work On the Origin of Species being published?

Reviewed: Gonen Ben Itzhak

Created by SL93 (talk). Self-nominated at 04:22, 21 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Just about long enough (plot is around 40% of the countable prose but the rest is still more than the minimum requirement), new enough, QPQ done, hook is verifiable. Only gripe here is the fair use rationale on the image has an unacceptable "n.a." on both NFCC #1 and #2 which should be resolved in order for the image to be usable in the article. Once that's done, I don't see anything else in the way of this being good to go. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 17:13, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man I changed the fair use rationale. While uploading the image, there was no option to add that information with the upload file tool. I didn't think to go back and look. Thanks for the review. SL93 (talk) 17:23, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

okay, cool beans, that works for me. Good to go, cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 17:48, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

bicentennial of death?

2082 is a long way off.. Gjxj (talk) 12:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC) its correct in the article, just the did you know is wrong... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gjxj (talk • contribs) 12:40, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]