Talk:Desert Mountain High School

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Desert Mountain High School article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Arizona Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Arizona may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

NOTICE TO NEUTRAL POINT OF VIEW

"To maintain neutral point of view, no club or team or any group associated with this page besides Desert Mountain High School"

Quit the communist bullshit. Post whatever links you have to contribute to the education of the reader of the article.

Whatever user just deleted my above comments (check the history to see what they were) needs to know that this is a talk page, which means everybody gets their opinion. I appreciate your opinion, however, cursing is not necessary, and you need consensus of the talk page before adding a group...like the band. I do support the band very much, but the way the paragraph was written and how it was placed was not acceptable. If you wish to contribute, do so according to Wikipedia standards and with our approval. And always sign your comments... Compguy11 (talk) 01:03, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NOTICE TO EVERYONE

I am getting really sick of this. Wikipedia's rules state that people must have the consensus of the talk page before making major changes. Saying that three famous actors(who just graduated last year) came from Desert Mountain is inaccurate and obviously bias. Not only does it disclose names of students, but it is just inaccurate. Since nobody likes to post in the talk page, I am just going to start reverting edits. People are making weird comments and are treating this page like crap. If this keeps happening, we are going to have to do semi-protection or something. So stop doing it! Post here if you have something to add...I watch this page constantly...and I respect Wikipedia...you should too. Compguy11 05:00, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages say that you should act boldly in improving pages. However, when an change is controversial, that's when going to the talk page and talking about it is a really good idea. MessedRocker (talk) 14:19, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article Re-Do

After some thinking, MessedRocker is correct. I don't know if you should have just taken out all material, as a lot of it is accurate, but just not cited. I will work with you to re-incorporate portions of the original article with accurate citations. I am going to go ahead and put back the paragraph I wrote about construction with a valid citation and some of the sports information. Should we put info in section headings again? Compguy11 00:48, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If a topic has enough information (at least two paragraphs or so), it could go in a subsection. MessedRocker (talk) 07:19, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Desert Mountain High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:23, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Footnotes

A great deal of this article needs footnotes. --2604:2000:E010:1100:2548:16B3:8544:B7CF (talk) 18:34, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]