Talk:Destroyer (Led Zeppelin bootleg recording)
This article was nominated for deletion on 21 June 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
This article should be renamed 'Destroyer' (without 'The')
[edit]Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Page moved to Destroyer (Led Zepplin bootleg recording). Vegaswikian (talk) 01:44, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
The Destroyer (Led Zeppelin bootleg recording) → Destroyer — The title of the original bootleg recording (soundboard) of this show (April 27, 1977) is "Destoyer", not "The Destroyer", which is the title of another bootleg, taped by some people in the audience, the following day. In order to avoid confusion between two very different bootlegs, you should rename this article. 195.6.73.237 (talk) 11:52, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
- And what do you suggest doing with the current article at Destroyer? Powers T 13:20, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Whatever we might call the Led Zeppelin recording, we certainly can't move it to "Destroyer", since this is an article on the type of warship, which is surely the primary meaning. Another of these incompetent move requests which ought to be snowballed out? PatGallacher (talk) 16:01, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Can we quick close this one. WP:PRIMARYTOPIC is most obviously the warship. This request does not seem the least bit though through.--Labattblueboy (talk) 16:46, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - If moved, it would go to Destroyer (Led Zepplin bootleg recording). Can we discuss the reason for the suggested move now? Is the album properly titled The Destroyer or Destroyer? - SummerPhD (talk) 17:13, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
- Or Destoyer, which is what the IP typed. Powers T 23:32, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
- Support move to Destroyer (Led Zeppelin bootleg recording) based on the two album covers shown in the article, and the external link. Station1 (talk) 05:33, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose original move request, I'm okay with just removing the "The". --Bejnar (talk) 22:15, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
- In other words, you want the article moved to Destroyer (Led Zepplin bootleg recording). - SummerPhD (talk) 12:49, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Destroyer (Led Zeppelin bootleg recording)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
There are a few important omissions in this article that I plan to check up on; however, this sentence is erroneous:
"Initial vinyl pressings of the bootleg incorrectly credited Seattle, Washington, the location of this show.[2]" The show was recorded in Cleveland (as the article earlier indicates), not Seattle. Seattle was erroneously credited because that is where the tape for the show ended up. It was created for a Kingdome staff member (the name of the guy eludes me) so that he could plan for the upcoming Seattle Zep show. The sentence should read "Initial vinyl pressings of the bootleg incorrectly credited Seattle, Washington as the location of this show.[2]" |
Substituted at 05:09, 13 May 2016 (UTC)