Talk:Devuan

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 December 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Linux Low‑importance

	Linux portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

Deletion

For deletion. """In addition, although notability is not temporary, a burst of coverage (often around product announcements) does not automatically make a product notable.""" This item is as likely to go away in a month as anything else. 24.222.13.228 (talk) 19:34, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I oppose also because the distro project is definitively started, so it's not a simple proposal anymore.

Asbesto (talk) 18:20, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I oppose the deletion of this article for the same reasons I already explained on fr:Discussion:Devuan :

Press coverage : PCWorld & The Register.co.uk ;
It's an important fork announcement due to the people involved and the associated reason (Roger Leigh, Denis Rojo, VUA, ...) ;
The pressure on people implied in Debian's decision to fork or not has probably never been so high (death threats, resignation of Ian Jackson, leaving of Joey Hess) ;
...

Apn (talk) 10:30, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I oppose deletion. The number and notability of the people involved, the considerable press coverage the project has received, the financial support it receives, and the alliances it has formed with other projects (such as eudev) cannot be waved away by mere speculations that the project might disappear someday. TTK (talk) 03:48, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I oppose deletion. Second all arguments above. The only thing that should be deleted is cancerD. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 179.181.75.209 (talk) 20:56, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What does mean "Devuan

On their web site, they says its to be read in italian but I didn't find any meaning of this word in italian. It would be great to clarify it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2788:1BA:C6C:F0E8:3A02:7A46:C1F4 (talk) 13:40, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I though that it meant "uan" is in italian, but "one" in italian seem to be "uno" ... maybe they are just saying "we are italian and we have actual rules how to pronounce unknown word based on letters instead of every word basically having it's own unique pronunciation as in English"? -- Hkmaly (talk) 15:28, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

'Devuan' doesn't mean anything in Italian. They want you to pronounce it as if it were an Italian word. So it would sound like "dev-one" in English. The group that develops Devuan is called the Veteran Unix Admins (VUA), and it is a fork of Debian, hence De(vua)n. The root word of Unix is "unit", which is synonymous with "one" and "one whole", hence the abbreviation "Dev-1" or "Dev-one". Jserio2 (talk) 21:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Devuan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160112142830/https://devuan.org/pics/devuan-ci-graph.png to http://www.devuan.org/pics/devuan-ci-graph.png

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:46, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

deVUAn

please add explain the VUA in deVUAN

I get asked about it really too much and need an explaination-URL

-P — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:C0:5F2F:5039:5DA:558C:3D0C:B189 (talk) 10:43, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is Devuan 3 now eol?

The date implies so, the color in the table probably just needs an update. David-ri93 (talk) 14:31, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]