Talk:Dexippus

Greece Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Biography / Roman & Byzantine / Classical

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Roman and Byzantine military history task force
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Comments

Why considered Latin author? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Connection (talk • contribs) 23:34, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The idea that Dexippus led the defense of Athens from the Heruli is called into question by a recently published paper (Justin Stover (2020), "New Light on the Historia Augusta", Journal of Roman Studies 110, pp. 167-198, paywalled version here (edit: unpaywalled version here, archived here)), which claims to have found by examining the manuscript traditions of the Historia Augusta that the passage therein mentioning Dexippus' military leadership, which is the main primary-source evidence for this idea, is in fact a garbled version of a passage that originally stated only that Dexippus had written about the Heruli's invasion. (Indeed, the previously conventional reading of that passage was, as Stover notes, so incongruous with the lack of corroboration on, e.g., Dexippus' funeral inscription that several previous editors had also suggested that it was the result of a scribal error.) However, this finding is still at the point of textual criticism of an ancient source; should the article be changed to include it now, or should we wait for the new discovery to be accepted or rejected by scholars generally? - 2601:80:4580:E0E0:7463:4BB9:87FE:89DE (talk) 03:18, 16 November 2020 (UTC); edited to add open-access link by 2601:80:4580:E0E0:7463:4BB9:87FE:89DE (talk) 00:24, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Useful source no open access

Perhaps useful [1] . Also available on other sites including Academia. Empire in Crisis: Gothic Invasions and Roman Historiography. --Andrew Lancaster (talk) 12:47, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]