From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Computing  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

DokuWiki on a Stick[edit]

Personal wiki talks about DokuWiki on a Stick, maybe the DokuWiki page also needs a mention of this, more info on this here. --Liloboy sa (talk) 14:48, 17 August 2015 (UTC)


I added some references and removed this mark. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talkcontribs) 11:00, 6 November 2007

Bitnami installer[edit]

I'm not seeing anything about the Bitnami dokuwiki installer here. Their site is also a bit sparse on information. I'm looking into this for my company and am surprised that all the info isn't already here, wikipedia usually beats me to the punch. :) At any rate, this is billed as "a virtual machine image preconfigured to run DokuWiki" but it's asking for an apache server upon install so I'm not sure how much it relies on the host operating system for help. --Gmuir (talk) 16:49, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

The current status of references/citations as of Dec 2009[edit]

As some citation remarks ({{primarysources}}, {{citecheck}} and {{citation style}}) were put into this article more than 20 monthes ago [1], what's the current status of them? I found few references have been increased since Mar 2008 (when these templates were added), but I guess they are enough as original sources. If anyone remove these citation/reference templates, I can translate this to other language(s). Any ideas for the status or references? --ayucat (talk) 18:32, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

The primarysources tag is still completely accurate: there are far too many citations to less-than-independent sources. But the second banner could be removed in my opinion. Steven Walling 19:00, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your consideration. I think so too. Also I thank (talk · contribs) to correct them. As a summary, the current status of references is that the article still needs primary citations. ayucat (talk) 16:46, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

References revisited[edit]

Looking through the references on this page, I see little more than trivial mentions, primary sources, or other non-reliable sources. This article may be subject to an AfD discussion if better sources cannot be located. I've added the {{refimprove}} tag. --AbsolutDan (talk) 18:25, 29 May 2011 (UTC)