Talk:Donghae Expressway

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by one or more inactive working groups.

Highways: Asia Low‑importance

	Roads portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Asian Highways Task Force.

merge[edit]

Busan–Ulsan Expressway should merge from here. Busan-Ulsan Expressway and Donghae Expressway in Korean Wikipedia merged too. Look ko:토론:부산울산고속도로#부산울산선, 동해선 합병 관련.--ㅂㄱㅇ (talk) 07:20, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ㅂㄱㅇ. It looks like a merger would make sense, though I don't speak enough Korean to know whether they are indeed the same thing, but looking at a translation of the merger discussion, it seems like the proposal is a bit contentious? Maybe we should wait to see the outcome of the merger discussion on the Korean Wikipedia and examine the arguments on both sides. What do you think? Ry's the Guy ^{(talk|contribs)} 09:00, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In South Korea's presidential decree, that two expressway is one.--ㅂㄱㅇ (talk) 12:00, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jungang Expressway has same problem too.--ㅂㄱㅇ (talk) 12:03, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No objection from me. Ry's the Guy ^{(talk|contribs)} 15:23, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @김지성1: who added a merge template to the Busan–Ulsan Expressway article some time ago and then removed it shortly after. What is your opinion, 김지성1? Ry's the Guy ^{(talk|contribs)} 15:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Opposed Because ko:부산울산고속도로 (기업)(Busan–Ulsan Expressway (Company)) is not merged to ko:동해고속도로(Donghae Expressway)--ツバル (talk) 23:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@ツバル: Busan–Ulsan Expressway is not about company. In Template:South Korean expressways, There are written that Expressway No.65 is Busan–Ulsan Expressway and Donghae Expressway. And that two expressways have Template:Infobox road. Donghae Expressway is looked like already merged. --ㅂㄱㅇ (talk) 08:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@ツバル: Don't you have any more dissent? --ㅂㄱㅇ (talk) 05:49, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for my long absence. I agree to remove Busan–Ulsan Expressway from Template:South Korean expressways. I think that Busan–Ulsan Expressway should be included in the company template like ko:template:대한민국의_고속도로_기업(ROK Expressway Companies).ツバル (talk) 14:47, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]