Talk:Dossiers Secrets d'Henri Lobineau

This article doesn't mention that allegedly Father Bérenger Saunière had supposedly discovered these seemingly ancient parchments inside of a pillar while renovating his church in Rennes-le-Château in 1891. And only then did they end up in the Bibliothèque nationale de France. However, this Wikipedia article only says that they are a "collection of documents planted in the Bibliothèque Nationale in Paris in the 1960s. They were then "discovered" in ]]1975]] by the man who had created them, ]]Pierre Plantard]]..." Robert C Prenic 13:17, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If Pierre Plantard planted the documents in the Bibliothèque Nationale in Paris in the 1960s, then discovered them in 1975 doesn't that mean that Bérenger Saunière's discovery of these seemingly ancient parchments in his church in Rennes-le-Château in 1891 is, like the Dossiers Secrets, a lie, a forgery?

Question?

Does anyone know where I can find a PDF file of the Dossiers Secrets?

Inaccurate Claims about Les Dossiers Secrets

I deleted the following claims from the article because they were inaccurate

- The Dossiers Secrets were "discovered in 1975 by the man who had created them, Pierre Plantard" - no such thing, this statement is based on a piece of fiction found in Dan Brown's 2003 novel, The Da Vinci Code.

- The Dossiers Secrets "seems to contain several medieval documents" - no such thing, I have a copy of the Dossiers Secrets from the Bibliotheque Nationale in Paris and all it contains is a collection of correspondence of spurious nature and origin, and a lot of home-made genealogies made on Pierre Plantard's stencil kit. I am prepared to be proved wrong that the Dossiers Secrets "seems to contain several medieval documents" the moment someone produces this material.

I have also added more informative material on Les Dossiers Secrets.

wfgh66 —Preceding comment was added at 13:08, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have the documents in PDF format? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.2.225.217 (talk) 05:51, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliotheque Nationale

You can order photocopies of anything from the Bibliotheque Nationale online - the worthless Dossiers Secrets included.Wfgh66 18:55, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

copyright

See Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Humanities#fraud_and_copyright. John Vandenberg (talk) 02:45, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Construct Improvement

I just reviewed some of the sentence structure and tightened the degree of references. Steve (talk) 23:49, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I removed the clause,

which was in turn used as source material for the 2003 bestselling novel, The Da Vinci Code.

To me, this seems too far afield of the original subject. Steve (talk) 00:00, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dossiers Secrets d'Henri Lobineau. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151125073947/http://www.asso-rlcdoc.dafun.com/elements_insolites/images/Lobineau.pdf to http://www.asso-rlcdoc.dafun.com/elements_insolites/images/Lobineau.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:52, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]