Talk:Dracopristis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:37, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have addressed the issues you’ve put forward. I have fixed the typos, made the text easier to read, fixed the research gate sources to include the journal they were published by, and I have also deleted the Gktoday source and replaced it with a better one. One thing of note is the crinoid diorama, I checked the description, and it says that is was confirmed to be published under the cc-by-2.0 license. It was transferred from flickr, if this image is a copyright violation I will gladly remove it. Is there anything else of note?. Fossiladder13 (talk) 16:02, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're going to want to move this comment to the bottom of Talk:Dracopristis/GA1 ... which is where the GAN discussion takes place... Ealdgyth (talk) 16:07, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cladogram in need of refining[edit]

Hello,I have gotten a cladogram on this fish, however something happened, and it needs work. prehaps User:Junnn11 could help me please. thanks.Fossiladder13 (talk) 16:47, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Dracopristis/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ealdgyth (talk · contribs) 15:17, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll pick this up. Ealdgyth (talk) 15:17, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Ealdgyth (talk) 15:05, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I have fixed the problems you have addressed, I have gotten rid of the GKtoday sources, I have fixed up the research gate sources, and I fixed the typos as well as adding to the article to make it easier to read. One thing of note is the crinoid image, I checked the description and it says that it was published under the CC 2.0 license, As far as I'm aware I don't think it's on the public domain. If this image is a copyright violation I will gladly remove it. Is there anything else that needs to be fixed?. Fossiladder13 (talk) 16:07, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ealdgyth Fossiladder13 (talk) 16:57, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Has this pingged you yet?. Fossiladder13 (talk) 16:59, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it has. It'll be a bit before I get to reviewing your changes, perhaps even tomorrow. My wiki time has to be worked into time when I'm working on other stuff. Ealdgyth (talk) 17:01, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ok got it, take your time. Fossiladder13 (talk) 17:05, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The photograph of a three-dimensional object can be released without affecting the underlying copyright of the object being photographed. Normally, this isn't an issue with museum photographs as the creation of the object being photographed is long enough ago that its not an issue (i.e. photographing a Renaissance sculpture is not an issue because the copyright on the sculpture has long since expired). Unfortunately, modern museum dioramas/images are usually copyrighted unless the museum has expressly released their copyright. I don't think it's worth the bother to try and keep this image when the diorama is likely not released into the public domain or licensed with a license we can use on wikipedia. And trying to claim fair use would be unlikely to work either. I say remove it. Ealdgyth (talk) 18:40, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
got it Fossiladder13 (talk) 19:51, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good, going to pass this now! Ealdgyth (talk) 19:56, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Theleekycauldron (talk) 10:55, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(
)
A reconstruction of Dracopristis
A reconstruction of Dracopristis

Created by Fossiladder13 (talk). Self-nominated at 14:49, 8 September 2022 (UTC).[reply]

  • I will do this one because I need a Quid Pro Quo for my DYK

The DYK is not eligible because it was submitted on 8 Sept 2022, whereas the GA review was succcessfully completed in March 2022. David notMD (talk) 03:10, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dracopristis&oldid=1207030761"