Talk:Dreamplay

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film: Nordic

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Nordic cinema task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

Speedy?!

Don't understand the speedy tag, esp. as you're claiming it's an advert! It cleary meets the notability guidelines for a film (screened at Cannes, no less), and stars Liv Ullmann and Bibi Andersson! Do you know anything about Nordic cinema or the criteria for WP:SD? Lugnuts (talk) 14:20, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See comments on my talk page- screening at cannes during a certain time period is suggestive that there may be sources but is not a substitute. Just add some additional reliable sources and it is fine AFAIK. The criteria further state that the film has to be a sig part of the career if you want to inherit notability from notable cast. Nerdseeksblonde (talk) 14:46, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will concede speedy is debatable but I had gotten those on several stubs I myself had placed so it seemed to be normal practice. I thought "advert" was more a warning than "spam" however. Literal interpretation of film guidelines doesn't seem to create a presumption of notability yet however as I understand the time period issues. Note also that guidelines are just that, not policy etc. One or two independent RS's shouldn't be that hard to point to if notability can be estalished. Nerdseeksblonde (talk) 15:15, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]