Talk:EMD F125
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Vossloh, also C175
[edit]Article should probably mention that the carbody is designed by Vossloh Spain (Vossloh España) http://www.railwaygazette.com/news/passenger/single-view/view/metrolink-orders-emd-passenger-locomotives.html
- " The locomotives are to feature a streamlined monocoque body designed by Vossloh Rail Vehicles" http://www.railwaygazette.com/news/passenger/single-view/view/metrolink-orders-emd-passenger-locomotives.html
also the "running gear" (probably means bogies)
- The locomotives will also be equipped with VRV high-speed running gear .. (VRV is Vossloh Rail Vehicles) see http://www.railjournal.com/index.php/locomotives/los-angeles-metrolink-orders-tier-4-diesels-from-emd.html
..Are these the first locomotives with a CAT C175 engine (along with the Vossloh Eurolight) ? Prof.Haddock (talk) 00:43, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
The Metrolink web site says they have purchased 40 locomotives for $300 million. http://www.metrolinktrains.com/pdfs/MetrolinkMatters/metrolink_matters_2016_AprMay.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Astrayelmgod (talk • contribs) 05:18, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
discrepancy between axle load and locomotive mass?
[edit]axle load is normally defined as the total mass divided by the number of axles? in this case there is a discrepancy between locomotive mass and the four axles. Can someone check that?
--Railconsultant (talk) 14:10, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- I've removed all the unreferenced information from the infobox. Mackensen (talk) 22:21, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Replacement reasons?
[edit]Is aging the only reason why they replaced the EMD F59PH and EMD F59PHI? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clrichey (talk • contribs) 04:15, 21 December 2021 (UTC)