Talk:EMD F125

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Vossloh, also C175

Article should probably mention that the carbody is designed by Vossloh Spain (Vossloh España) http://www.railwaygazette.com/news/passenger/single-view/view/metrolink-orders-emd-passenger-locomotives.html

" The locomotives are to feature a streamlined monocoque body designed by Vossloh Rail Vehicles" http://www.railwaygazette.com/news/passenger/single-view/view/metrolink-orders-emd-passenger-locomotives.html

also the "running gear" (probably means bogies)

The locomotives will also be equipped with VRV high-speed running gear .. (VRV is Vossloh Rail Vehicles) see http://www.railjournal.com/index.php/locomotives/los-angeles-metrolink-orders-tier-4-diesels-from-emd.html

..Are these the first locomotives with a CAT C175 engine (along with the Vossloh Eurolight) ? Prof.Haddock (talk) 00:43, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Metrolink web site says they have purchased 40 locomotives for $300 million. http://www.metrolinktrains.com/pdfs/MetrolinkMatters/metrolink_matters_2016_AprMay.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Astrayelmgod (talk • contribs) 05:18, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

discrepancy between axle load and locomotive mass?

axle load is normally defined as the total mass divided by the number of axles? in this case there is a discrepancy between locomotive mass and the four axles. Can someone check that?

--Railconsultant (talk) 14:10, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed all the unreferenced information from the infobox. Mackensen (talk) 22:21, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replacement reasons?

Is aging the only reason why they replaced the EMD F59PH and EMD F59PHI? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clrichey (talk • contribs) 04:15, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]