Talk:EXOSAT

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the EXOSAT article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Spaceflight Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

EXOSAT or Exosat

I have asked about this a number of times, such as Manual of Style / non-initial acronyms. Unfortunately despite unhelpful responses to most of these it is clear the MOS in it's discussion of acronyms does not include cases of non-initialisms and it is left up to other policies like Common Name. Since EXOSAT and Exosat are both used in sources then it is not wrong for this article to use EXOSAT, certainly MOS doesn't comment on it. ChiZeroOne (talk) 15:52, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your point; however, EXOSAT does come from "European X-ray Observatory Satellite", which is why I changed the article around. The same has occurred for Solrad. SOLar RADiation satellite program (SOLRAD) has been changed to Solrad per MOS. Marshallsumter (talk) 16:15, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes EXOSAT is a Non-Initialism (often described as a type of acronym). If Non-Initialisms are treated like ordinary acronyms then a capitalised EXOSAT would be correct. However sometimes they are not for various reasons, and in fact ESA themselves are confused over whether EXOSAT or Exosat is the correct form. This is what led me to ask what the MOS's position on this was, unfortunately the answer appears to be that the MOS doesn't make comment on this and so we just use Common Name or failing that what the article was originally called. SOLRAD may have been changed to Solrad, but i see no reason why MOS can be used to back up either that change or this one, because nowhere does it state that is the correct form for Non-Initialisms.

I see it was GW who made the change to SOLRAD, perhaps this issue should be brought up on the WikiProject Spaceflight discussion page because there are many similar non-initialisms in spaceflight so it would be good to have a standardised viewpoint. ChiZeroOne (talk) 16:37, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on EXOSAT. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120829162441/http://md1.csa.com/partners/viewrecord.php?requester=gs&collection=TRD&recid=A8339971AH&q=&uid=788028604&setcookie=yes to http://md1.csa.com/partners/viewrecord.php?requester=gs&collection=TRD&recid=A8339971AH&q=&uid=788028604&setcookie=yes

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:01, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Highlights

According to an article from Aarde & Kosmos issue 7 from 1986, ‘EXOSAT is niet meer’ by drs. H. Eggen, the following points were most notable about EXOSAT:

It proved the existence of neutron stars.
It found X-ray active galactic nuclei, suggesting black holes at their centres.
It boosted European space research and development.

At a glance, it seems that none of these points are mentioned in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.61.180.106 (talk) 15:57, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]