Jump to content

Talk:East Longmeadow, Massachusetts

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 February 2021 and 18 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): To6791.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:00, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claims removed

[edit]
It is especially unique because the right of way is yielded to the travellers in the center of the rotary.

That is actually the default arrangement by state law. There is another rotary in the area where the right of way is reversed, but it does have traffic lights. -- Beland 00:58, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is very intimidating and people from Connecticut often go through it backwards.

That's amusing to imagine, but unreferenced. -- Beland 00:58, 30 November 2006 (UTC) It is especially unique because the right of way is yielded to the travellers in the center of the rotary.[reply]

[Rotary] has 7 streets going ito it, more than any other known in the world

Arc de Triumph in Paris has 11 streets. Besides, I live in EL, but come from Mexico City, and there are rotaries with more than 7 streets, and are far bigger in Mex. City than EL. --Andresgmejiar (talk) 18:08, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ahhh!...???

[edit]
"Because of the danger of no traffic lights, accidents could occur quite frequently at this rotary. Though for some reason, there are very few accidents! ahhh!"

This phrase, though amusing, ought to be removed. On the "roundabout" page, it lists examples of rotaries with lights and signs, and why the lack of them actually improves traffic safety and flow. Roteries themselves are far safer than the average intersection, due to all of the traffic going the same way. Funny, though. Ahhh!

MisplacedFate1313 (talk) 04:41, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another Dubious Claim

[edit]

Quote "East Longmeadow hosts an annual Fourth of July Parade. It is the largest Fourth of July parade in western Massachusetts". Can this be verified? As far as I know, Pittsfield, MA., has the largest 4th of July parade, not only in Western Massachusetts, but one of the largest in New England. (See WNYT Pittsfield Parade Article) NECRATSpeak to me 09:44, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on East Longmeadow, Massachusetts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:21, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on East Longmeadow, Massachusetts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:50, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]