Talk:Economy of Lithuania

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Lithuania (Rated Start-class, Top-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Top  This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
Note icon
Review comments: M.K. (talk) 00:50, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Economics (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Old talk[edit]

The contents of this article seems pretty outdated, by some 5 years or so. Lysy 19:30, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This is indeed true, but the fr:Wikipédia:Êconomie de la Lituanie is not in a much better position. I have tried to make the best of both. If someone is able to delve into this subject, which is really not in my realm of competence, I am sure everybody would like it. In any case, I stay on watch, so as to be able to translate any amelioration into French. Note that the French text (which I found as it was) is probably a bit better structured than the English one, and there should be something to be considered there.
Trassiorf 20:50, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

POV[edit]

Okay, I have added a POV template to the page because it reads, frankly, like a press-release. Whether or not this was intentional, it is pretty obvious with phrasing such as:

  • Inflation in Lithuania is no longer a problem. Economic sentiment and confidence of all business activities have rebounded from a record low at the beginning of the year 2009 and suggest further improvements in the economy.
  • Lithuania attracts foreign investors not only because of small tax burden but also because of a skilled workforce, a well-developed infrastructure and a bigger domestic market than the other two Baltic states combined.
  • Lithuania has an ambitious plan to become a Northern European innovation centre by 2020. To reach this goal, it is putting its efforts into attracting FDI to added-value sectors, especially IT services, software development, and consulting services, as well as finance or logistics.
  • Lithuania has prepared an attractive environment for business start-ups
  • Lithuania takes the first position in the EU by the number of students in the country.
  • An excellent telecommunication infrastructure and a well-educated, multilingual workforce enable Lithuania to provide high quality business services worldwide.

There's more, but that's a pretty good set of examples, I feel. Now, I don't really have a whole lot of time to spend on this, so while I'll do what I can, that's not going to be a whole lot. Aero-Plex (talk) 20:08, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, the style of this article suggests that it was probably copy-pasted from somewhere. Economy of Poland has the same problem. Nobody cares enough to fix it.Keverich2 (talk) 18:57, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Economy of Lithuania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Question? Archived sources still need to be checked

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:53, 25 January 2016 (UTC)