Talk:Education in New York (state)

UFSD

Most suburban and many other school districts are called "Union Free School District". Shouldn't the article explain the significance of this term? Jim.henderson (talk) 16:44, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Education in New York (state). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061017021421/http://www.observer.com/printpage.asp?iid=13093&ic=Editorials to http://www.observer.com/printpage.asp?iid=13093&ic=Editorials

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:45, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Allowing illiterate people to work as teachers

User:Aquillion removed the following

In March 2017, the New York Times reported, "The Board of Regents on Monday eliminated a requirement that aspiring teachers in New York State pass a literacy test to become certified after the test proved controversial because black and Hispanic candidates passed it at significantly lower rates than white candidates."

and commented

(rv; obviously undue, not a major part of the overall history of education in New York State.)

Allowing people who can't read to be hired as public school teachers is heavily relevant to the subject of education.

I propose that this content be put back in the article.

Brock88734 (talk) 15:02, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

The rest of the article covers extremely sweeping long-term issues related to the topic; focusing excessively on a single article that seems to have received minimal WP:SUSTAINED coverage is clearly giving it undue weight. If you think that this has had a significant impact on New York state education as a whole, it should be easy to find long-term coverage highlighting its importance, surely? Without that it feels like its inclusion would be unbalanced. There are many, many articles related to various aspects of education in New York state, and countless changes to policies connected to it each year; what about this particular aspect makes it so important relative to the others? The article also doesn't reflect your framing (it was just one of several tests, and was removed over concerns that it was discriminatory - failing it does not mean that someone is illiterate.) --Aquillion (talk) 03:45, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Your reply is very well thought out, and makes multiple good points. Thank you for your comment. I will not be putting the content back in the article. Brock88734 (talk) 11:44, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

References