Talk:Element Capital Management

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Finance & Investment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Content length

Is there a minimum amount of content required for a page? The content to source ratio is good but just not much.--LedgerTom (talk) 22:03, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Key strategic market calls

I have removed a section of this article that listed four of Element's "key strategic market calls" – episodes where the fund correctly predicted market behavior and collected a windfall. Despite the fact that the edits were well-sourced, my concern is that the section is nonetheless promotional, and that these episodes may have been cherrypicked to bolster the fund's reputation.

I am not opposed to letting this article have a section on corporate history. Any such section, however, should be balanced, discuss both significant successes and failures, avoid skewing towards recent events, and be neutrally worded. What I am opposed to is having this article become a "greatest hits" selection. If independent editors believe that my assessment is out of line, please post here and I will consider withdrawing my objection. Best, Altamel (talk) 03:12, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]