This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Wikipedia guidelines at Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Lead_section#First_sentence say "If possible, the page title should be the subject of the first sentence". This page doesn't quite do that. The page name is "Ellen Dubois" but the subject of the first sentence is "Ellen Carol DuBois", which is the name that she uses for her academic articles and books. If no one objects, I will rename this page to "Ellen Carol DuBois in a couple of days. Bilpen (talk) 15:55, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It is standard to start a biographical article with the full name of a person, but for the title of the article to be a shorter version of the name as commonly used by the subject. In this case, she has some publications under "Ellen Dubois" [1], is listed as "Ellen Dubois" in the UCLA History faculty listing [2][3], and is called "Ellen Dubois" in other sources used in the article [4][5]. On the other hand as you say she also publishes under the longer name and there are other sources that name her like that [6][7]. So I don't feel strongly either way, but I don't think the case for renaming is as clear-cut as you make it. On the other hand I think the article is currently too short and would be improved by more efforts to add some more information based on those sources. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:06, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Instead of renaming this article, I created a redirect using "Ellen Carol DuBois". I am trying to avoid having some material I am working on end up with her linked name in red font. I used "DuBois", not "Dubois", because that is how it almost always appears.Bilpen (talk) 23:11, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Moving to Ellen DuBois instead of Ellen Dubois, at least, seems noncontroversial. I will go ahead and do that; we can always move back if enough others disagree. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:08, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}