Jump to content

Talk:En Tus Manos (film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comment

[edit]

This article should not be deleted. It is listed as not having credible sources. This is not true. Almost every word on this page is linked an outside webpage related to the film. One of the website used many times in this article is IMDB, one of the film industries most notable websites for films. The film has to be notable and crediable for it to even get on IMDB in the first place! Also, the producers, actors, writers, directors, and all participants have been in other movies as well, which are linked to their names to outside credible sources. In addition, Wikipedia states that the film must have been issued some award notable in the film industry. This film has won the Best Short Film Award at the Beverly Hills Film Festival in California. It lists it under festivals at the bottom of the page. Anyone reading this article who clicks on the links will realize that it has many credible and reliable sources. The movie itself has its own website listed with its official selections for many film festivals. The film has been listed in newspaper and magazine articles which are also listed at the bottom of the page under Press. Was this page even read or looked at before it was considered for deletion?! Wikipedia also states that it might be deleted for advertising. This page is hardly an advertisement, it is ,however, very informative. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.148.112.2 (talk) 16:36, 3 May 2010

The references need to be improved to satisfy the criteria of WP:NOTFILM. What is needed is "substantial coverage" in independent sources. Hyper linking to the names of people, etc. is not the way to go about this. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 17:36, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am glad that some sources have been found. But better sources need to be added. Please read WP:NOTFILM for guidance. Exhibition in festivals is not enough, awards, substantial coverage in national news sources, or by notable critics should be sought out. The hyper links should be removed, or converted into refernces if linked to reliable sources. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 21:35, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think? I removed some of the hyperlinks? What else does it need to not be deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.148.112.2 (talk) 19:47, 5 May 2010 (UTC) Is this page still up for deletion? Is its credibility established? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.148.112.2 (talk) 15:28, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is this article still up for deletion? I removed the paragraph stating it was because it looks like no one has commented on it here on the talk page since May. If it is still up for deletion please comment or consider it a closed case and leave up the page for us fans. Thanks.

Hello, can anyone help me change the fix the picture so it is clear? The poster image previously looked fine, but now it looks funny. Please help. :) Apeterson7 (talk) 18:24, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on En Tus Manos (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:34, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on En Tus Manos (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:00, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:En_Tus_Manos_(film)&oldid=1031719234"